CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Predictive factors for anastomotic leakage in laparoscopic colorectal surgery

Author: 
Dr. Mushtaq Chalkoo, Dr. Fatima Farooq, Dr. Suryavel S., Dr. Gulam Nabi Guroo, Dr. Naeem Ahmed and Dr. Suhaib Bashir
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background: Anastomotic leakage is one of the most feared complications of gastrointestinal surgery following any gastrointestinal anastomosis with overall impact on functional and oncologic outcome and drainage on hospital resources. It causes considerable morbidity and mortality. It is a serious complicationfollowing restorative resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) and contributes to local tumor recurrence. As the improvement in safety of oncologicalsurgeries has increased, the anastomotic leakage still remains the most feared and devastating complication in both the surgical and oncological views, respectively. Anastomotic leakage also affects the outcome of surgery, increases the hospitalization expenses and worsens the prognosis. Objectives: To identify pre- operative, intra-operative and post-operative predictive factors for anastomoticleak in patients undergoing colorectal resection by way of the laparoscopic approach. Study Design: It was a prospective-observational study of 18 months (one and a half year) conducted in the Department ofGeneral Surgery, GMC, Srinagar. Participants: A total of 35 cases of laparoscopic colorectal surgeries operated by a single well-experienced laparoscopic surgeon from a single surgical unit (>18 years of age) were included while patients ≤18 years and patients undergoing open colorectal procedures were excluded. Methodology: After admission detailed history and clinical examination of the patient was done. Patient's data including gender, age, clinical presentation, tumorlocation and histopathological type and grade of tumorwas noted. Pre-operative investigations concentrating on hematological and biochemical parameters, radiological imaging was done in each patient. Results: Out of 35 patients 2 (5.71%) patients had anastomotic leakage. In regard with the procedure done, anastomotic leakage occurred in 1 (5.6%) patient with right hemicolectomy and 1 (14.3%) patients with low anterior resection. Considering the type of anastomosis, both end-to-end and side-to-side anastomosis showed equal distribution in anastomotic leakage. Both the patients of anastomotic leakage had malignant disease. Conclusion: In our study, we had 2 patients out of 35 with anastomotic leakage. We observed higher age group, both male and female genders, type and site of anastomosis, level of anastomosis, size of tumor (≤2 cm above anal verge),intraoperative blood loss and underlying comorbidities such as vascular disease are the most prevalent risk factors for anastomoticleakage. Implications: Ours was an Observational Study. After observing the predictive factors for anastomotic leakage we recommend the thorough work-up of patients to note all the risk factors that can complicate the post-operative period of patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery for the better outcome.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran