CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Effect of ferrule on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with parapost xp and parapost fiber lux under tangential load-an in vitro study

Author: 
Dr. Varun Viswanath V., Dr. Ramesh K Nadiger, Dr. Lekha K, Dr. Sitalakshmi P.T. and Dr. Adarsh V Hegde
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Introduction: Endodontically treated teeth are at higher risk of fracture than vital teeth due to the decreased moisture content in dentin and most of the times, compromised structural integrity. The cast post and core technique has been advocated as the gold standard restoration for decades, but the traditional technique is time consuming and involves great laboratory and material costs. Introduction of prefabricated metallic post systems and esthetic post systems such as fiber-reinforced and zirconia ceramic posts have improved the results significantly. A dental ferrule is an encircling band of cast metal around the coronal surface of the tooth. The availability of 2.0 mm of coronal tooth structure between the shoulder of the crown preparation and the tooth/core junction has been shown to enhance fracture resistance and preventing fracture and dislodgement of the post. Objective: To assess the effect of ferrule on the fracture resistance of teeth restored with Parapost XP and Parapost Fiber Lux under tangential load. Methodology: Forty Human maxillary central incisors extracted within three months were stored in saline solution. Coronal sections of teeth to be restored were sectioned with carborundum discs 2mm occlusal to cementoenamel junction. Forty maxillary central incisors specimen collected were divided into two groups. Group 1 included 20 central incisors without ferrule and were further divided into two subgroups, ‘a’ with Parapost XP and ‘b’ with Parapost Fiber Lux. Group 2 included 20 central incisors with 2mm ferrule and were further divided into two subgroups, ‘a’ with Parapost XP and ‘b’ with Parapost Fiber Lux. The teeth were then endodontically instrumented and root canals were obturated using gutta percha. After root canal treatment, teeth were prepared for post space by means of preparation drills. Self adhesive resin cement was used to cement these posts. After removal of excess cement, resin cement was allowed for 5 minutes to polymerise followed by core build up using Paracore, followed by full coverage crowns. Finally, all the specimens were embedded in the acrylic resin block to a depth of 2mm below the cementoenamel junction. The mounted specimens were secured in a universal testing machine and a force was applied at a crosshead speed of 1mm/min until fracture occurred. The fracture load was recorded in Newtons. Results: When tangential loads were applied to the samples, it was seen that the teeth restored with posts having ferrule withstood higher amounts of force before fracture when compared to those without ferrule. Conclusion: Within the limitation of the present study, it can be concluded that the ferrule effect plays a key role in increasing the fracture resistance of teeth restored with post and core.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran