CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Effect of different concentrations of titanium dioxide nanoparticles onthe mechanical properties ofa maxillofacial silicone elastomer

Author: 
Dr. Shailendra Singh, Dr. Girish Nazirkar, Dr. Bikash Pattanaik, Dr. Trupti Haralkar, Dr. Akhilesh Nikam and Dr. Snehal Mane
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Introduction: Maxillofacial materials are used to replace missing facial parts which have been lost through disease or trauma. They are usually comprised of poly (dimethylsiloxane) (PDMS) elastomers. Methods: The study was conducted using commercially available silicone elastomer used for the fabrication of maxillofacial prosthesis and UV shielding Titanium di-oxide nano- oxide particles. Various amounts of TiO2 nano-oxide particles were added to the silicone elastomer: 0%, 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5%, 3%. A total of six experimental groups were created by combining silicone elastomer (Cosmesil M511) with Ti O2nano- oxide particles. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) software Version 20. One way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to test for any significant difference between the mean values of the materials tested. Post- test (Tukey post hoc) was used to determine whether the mean value of any particular material differed significantly from another specified material, while considering all the data. Result: Mean (SD) change values of tensile strength for Control Group, 0.5% TiO2, 1% TiO2, 1.5% TiO2, 2% TiO2, 2.5% TiO2, 3% TiO2 was 3.7576 ±.06807, 3.8280± .09558, 4.0610± .06883,4.4210± .05078, 4.7865± .04694, 5.0245± .04264, 4.0984±.06753, 4.2824± .45293 respectively. The Change in Tear Strengthwas for Control group, TIO21, TIO22, TIO23, TIO24, TIO25, TIO26 was 3.5002 ± .05726, 4.2855 ± .07651, 4.6525± .07911, 5.6763 ± .11152, 6.0038 ± .08204, 6.2561 ± .09440, 5.0689 ± .10089respectively. Change in Tear Strengthwas for Control group, TIO21,TIO22, TIO23, TIO24, TIO25, TIO26 was 528.8000± 6.03324, 518.5000± 4.92725, 500.6000± 10.52193, 476.7000± 4.66786, 459.8000± 7.40570, 442.4000± 5.46097, 420.2000± 6.25033respectively The Change in Tear Strengthwas for Control group, TIO21TIO22, TIO23, TIO24, TIO25, TIO26 was 34.8700 ± .40291, 35.8000± .64118, 37.0300± .75137, 38.1700± .35292, 40.0900± .43321, 41.5200± .44672, 41.6900± .28067 Respectively and these observed differences were statistically significant (p<0.05). Conclusion: Within the limitations of this study, it was concluded that the use of tulle for the reinforcement of maxillofacial silicone elastomer provided the latter with improved mechanical properties, especially in terms of tear resistance. However, these results should be further supported with more clinical studies.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

CHUDE NKIRU PATRICIA
Nigeria
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran