CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Comparison between the side effects of spinal and general anesthesia during caesarean section

Author: 
Dr. Dawood Ahmed Dawood Sulaiman and Dr. Alaa Adrees A. Al-Dhannoon
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background: Currently, spinal anesthesia is an acceptable method for cesarean section (CS) throughout the world, since general anesthesia is associated with higher maternal morbidity and mortality rates. The current study was aimed to compare the side effects of general vs. spinal anesthesia during caesarean operation. Materials and methods: This study was performed on women who were candidates for elective Caesarean section at Nineveh private hospital, inMosulcity, Iraq. Informed consents were obtained from all the patients and the risks and side effects of both spinal and general anesthesia were explained preoperatively, One day after the operation, all mothers were examined with respect to the variables. A total of (100) randomly selected participants, Half Of them (50) participants referred as case group A (undergo operation with general anesthesia), and the other half (50 ) participants were referred as case group B (undergo operation with spinal anesthesia). Blood samples were collected before and after the operation to see the differences in Hemoglobin concentration and platelets count, Blood pressure and body temperature were also measured after operation, other parameters were collected from patient's thick report or by direct interviewing questionnaire. Results: The Mean Age Of Participants Was 32.5 Years Old With A Range Between 25-40 Years. The Mean Age of Participants with Spinal Anesthesia Was 32.32 While for Participants with General Anesthesia was 32.72. Majority of them have their first or second caesarean section. 46/50 (92%) of spinal anesthesia was decided with the doctor while 40/50 (80%) of general anesthesia was chosen the patient's themselves. Local pain and headache were clearly observed in spinal anesthesia while vomiting, fever, ICU admission and infection were very rare when using both types of anesthesia. Marked differences were observed in the hemoglobin concentration and platelets count when using the two techniques of anesthesia before and after operation. In our study, we observed in 44 % of participants suffered from pain and 36 % suffered from headache after operation in both groups A and B. No remarkable difference was noted on blood pressure range (but some participants have slightly decrease in BP). All participants have slight changes in platelets count, and Hemoglobin concentration. Conclusion: We should cautiously consider that general anesthesia may be associated with slightly increased in peri-operative room time , hospital stay & the differences were observed in the tested parameters between general and spinal anesthesia regarding postoperative pain at injection site , headache , lumbar pain , vomiting ,fever ICU admission & infection So it is highly recommended to leave the decision of type of anesthesia to the doctor upon patients' clinical condition.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

CHUDE NKIRU PATRICIA
Nigeria
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran