CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Comparative evaluation of two step bonding system and conventional bonding system on shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets - an invitro study

Author: 
Dr. Sai Sankalp, B., Dr. Santosh Reddy, B., Dr. Seena Naik, E., Dr. Thirumal Naik, M., Dr. Rahul Goud Padala and Dr. Sri Laxmi Nalam
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background: Technological and material advancements in Orthodontics has made possible a constant improvement in the quality of orthodontic treatment. Recently, more advanced self-etching adhesive materials have been used by minimizing the requirement for priming and etching lowering the chance of contamination and shortens bonding times. The current study involves the use of new self-priming adhesive resin AQUALINE LC, reducing the chair side time. Aims & Objectives: To evaluate light cure adhesive resins' shear bond strength both with and without primer. to evaluate three distinct light-cure adhesive resins' shear bond strengths both with and without primer. Material & Methods: 75 non-carious, non-fluorosed premolars that had been therapeutically removed were used in the investigation. Teeth were separated into 5 groups. Aqualine LC in Group A; Transbond XT with Primer is in Group B; Transbond XT without Primer is in Group C; Enlight with primer is in Group D; and Enlight without primer is in Group E. Results:Aqualine LC (Group A), Transbond XT with primer (Group B), Transbond XT without (Group C), Enlight with primer (Group D), and Enlight without primer (Group E) have mean values of 5.8713, 6.0840, 5.174, 5.573, and 4, respectively. This shows that, compared to all other groups with and without primer, the overall mean of Enlight without primer has the lowest bond strength, followed by Transbond XT without primer, Enlight with primer, Aqualine LC, and Transbond XT with primer. Conclusion: All of the primers utilized in the study (Aqualine LC, Transbond XT, and Enlight) had bond strengths that were clinically acceptable.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Govindaiah Simuni
USA
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran