Coblation benefits of tonsillectomy versus traditional tonsillectomy

In this study, we compare the traditional surgeries to minimally invasive surgeries of tonsillectomy patients and adenoid hypertrophy to rule out the benefits of minimally invasive surgeries compared to traditional surgeries. The criteria for choosing patients is to understand the severity of the procedure the hospital stays, postoperative bleeding, and the recovery time strategy of tonsillectomy patients and adenoidectomy. (We collected and analyzed 150 patients with coblation tonsillectomy compared traditional tonsillectomy and the benefits of minimally invasive surgery compared to traditional. Surgery The total number of patients was 150. There are male and female patients. 78 males, underwent coblation tonsillectomy 72 females, underwent traditional tonsillectomy and they all performed coblation compared with traditional surgeries. Of the number of patients aged 4 to 6 years, most are younger than age 15, 72 were about 4-6, years, and 78 were over age 6. Material and Method: Comparing 150patients were divided into two groups coblation tonsillectomy was performed to the amount of intraoperative bleeding and recovery time pain was measured all patients were followed for 14 months, compared with blood loss and management Results: coblation tonsillectomy was more convenient compared to traditional cold steel dissection tonsillectomy the mean duration of surgery. Conclusion: Coblation tonsillectomy gives the significant advantage of dissection methods with blood and pain less and return to normal activities, coblation is better recommended in all patients performing tonsillectomy the main purpose of this study is to understand the significance of less pain and less bleeding compared to the old technique of cold steel tonsillectomy the benefits are less bleeding, less postoperative bleeding, and quick recovery.