CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Joint development lamina wood beams of wood acacia (Acacia mangium Willd) and camphor (Dryobalanops spp.,)

Author: 
Joko Suryono, Bandi Supraptono, Edy Budiarso and Isna Yuniar Wardhani
Subject Area: 
Social Sciences and Humanities
Abstract: 

Increasing the power of Acacia wood and wood beams Camphor at making lamina based on the concept of deformation. This research is compiled from Acacia wood board sheets and wood Camphor each test sample used as solid beams, beam lamina two layers, beams lamina three layers to gain strength MoE and MoR. Raw material for adhesive laminated beams Dovebond 30 and adhesive Synteko 1909 with Hardener 1999. The nature of physics and mechanics of wood : Testing Results Acacia wood moisture content < of wood Camphor and density, shear strength, MoE, MoRAcacia wood > Camphor wood. Thus, the smaller the value of test results of water content, the density value, the value of the shear strength, the strength values MoE and strength MoR result will be even greater. Beam glued lamina strength: shear adhesion strength of laminated wood beams Camphor using adhesives Dovebond 30 and Synteko 1909 Camphor wood glued have better power, better for the adhesive Dovebond 30 and adhesive Synteko 1909 amounted to 33,95% and 23,09% > beam Acacia wood lamina. Comparison beams lamina two layer and three layer: Camphor Wood, a second beam lamina two layers and three layers of adhesive Dovebond 30 experienced MoE power efficiency of 2,79% ; 16.80% and the second beam lamina two layers and three layers of adhesive Synteko 1909 experience MoE power efficiency of 2,31% ; 11,32% of the strength of a solid beam MoE . And the second beam lamina two layers and three layers of adhesive Dovebond 30 experienced MoR power efficiency of 4,15% ; 4,58% and the second beam lamina two layers of adhesive Synteko 1909 MoR have weakening strength of 4,86% and a triple beam lamina experience MoR power efficiency by 4,58% on the strength of a solid beam MoR. Strength value MoE and MoR best : Strength MoE and MoR number of layers and Camphor wood design Synteko 1909 adhesive layer number for interaction with the design is very significant, then followed by a further test. Value MoE further test the strength of interaction with a number of layers of design occurs in the number of layers of two layers with a design on three layer type 2 the average value of 95.899 kg/cm2 ; 93.299 kg/cm2 and 89.781 kg/cm2. Acacia solid wood beams, beams solid and lamina beams Camphor wood can be used as construction materials in sheltered conditions. The selection of adhesive to provide adhesion value for the type of wood used as a beam lamina. MoE strength values and MoR, plan beam lamina of the type of wood that will be used is to get some references of previous studies. Necessary to study some other type of wood to be used as laminated beams with due regard to the age of the tree and the anatomical structure of the wood.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran