CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Wettability of denture base materials: a comparative invitro study

Author: 
Dr Manikantan N.S., 2r Rajesh C., 3Dr Rajesh Chandran, 4r Dhanya Balakrishnan, Dr Manoj Kumar, Dr Brijesh Shetty and Dr Shiny Joseph
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background & objectives: In edentulous patient, the replacement of teeth and lost tissues with a complete denture to obtain an acceptable functional and esthetic result remains an important challenge for the practitioner. Retention is that quality inherent in the prosthesis to resist the forces of dislodgement along the path of placement, which is in turn dependent on the “wettability” of denture base materials. There are various types of denture base materials that are used to fabricate the complete denture prostheses. Since wettability influences comfort and retention of complete dentures, a study to comparatively evaluate the wettability property of denture base materials available in our country would be helpful in assessing their role in the success of prosthesis. Method: Mainly five autopolymerising and five heat cure denture base materials are included in this study. The samples (200 in total) were made and the half of them was sand abraded and the remaining half was untreated. The wettability of the samples was checked with Telescopic Goniometer, using artificial saliva as the wetting medium. The wettability of the solid by a liquid is determined by measuring the contact angle () between the drop of the liquid and the plane surface of the solid. A low contact angle indicates good wetting and the high contact angle value indicates poor wetting. The advancing and receding contact angles were recorded and the equilibrium contact angle is measured using the equation. The difference between the advancing and the receding contact angles (Contact angle Hysteresis) were also found which is directly related to the complete denture retention. Results: The statistical analysis was carried out using ANOVA (Analysis of variance - Fishers F test) and Mann- Whitney ‘U’ test (Z) using SPSS version 10. Here mean and standard deviation of contact angle hysteresis and equilibrium contact angle of each group were also taken in to consideration. The present study showed that the surface treatment increases the wettability of the denture base materials. Among the selected five heat-cure and five autopolymerized brands, the DPI heat-cure as well as DPI autopolymerized sand-abraded samples have shown the highest range (11.3 and 10.1 respectively) of contact angle hysteresis compared to their conventional groups and believed to provide more denture retention compared to other brands selected for the study. Conclusion: The increased surface area and the high hydrophilic nature exhibited by the sand-abraded samples is believed to be the main factor which increase its contact angle hysteresis and the increased retention of the complete denture. Among the studied samples from both autopolymerized and heat-cure materials, the DPI sand-abraded samples showed the highest range of contact angle hysteresis.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran