CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Genesis of similarities and dissimilarities between Ethiopian and Indian federalism

Author: 
Prakasa Rao, D. S. and Mohammed Usman Darasa
Subject Area: 
Social Sciences and Humanities
Abstract: 

This article has explored and analyzed some of the key similarities and dissimilarities between Federal systems of Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia and India. In doing so, it found out that both Ethiopia and India are countries of diverse people with diverse culture, Religion, history way of life etc. Their respective constitutions are federal in character, which is compatible with societal nature of both countries- Indian as well as Ethiopian societies are essentially federal in character. By assuming that, countries like Ethiopia and India with vast diversities in terms of culture, language, religion, history, way of life etc cannot be administered and ruled from the single political centre. Keeping these factors in mind, the makers of the constitutions of India and Ethiopia rightly opted for Federal forms of governments. In spite of their out outstanding similarities, there are also differences between them. This article tried to compare and contrast some of the key principles of federalism under their respective constitutions. , it does not consider factual situations and only looks into or and descries the constitutional landscape. It covers, Inter alia; the principle of separation of power, supremacy of the constitution, the principle of check and balance, the principle of parliamentary system and parliamentary democracy, Judicial independency and judicial review adaption of federalism and accommodation of diversities, fundamental rights and freedoms, etc. In spite of substantial similarities, there are also dissimilarities or divergences’ between the Indian and Ethiopian Federal systems. The key dissimilarities include: Unitary tendencies of Indian Federalism, Judicial review etc. Courts are not given the power of judicial review in Ethiopia; rather this power is given to house of Federation. This is one of an innovative and home grown approach introduced and adapted by constitution of Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia. Allocation of the powers to the presidents is another area of dissimilarities between Ethiopian and Indian Federalism. Unlike Ethiopian president of the state, Indian, president has three veto powers in the union legislative process which include that he/she can refuse to agree to a law, which would mean an absolute veto. He can also send the bill back to the parliament for changes, or he could take no action on the bill. In the case of Ethiopia, the president has no role in the law making process of the country. The writer of this article would argue that Ethiopia should draw lesson from India and amend its constitution so as give meaning for to the role of the president. Therefore, the country would have convincing reason to keep the Presidency.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

CHUDE NKIRU PATRICIA
Nigeria
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran