CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Effectiveness of lemon peel extract on knee pain among patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Author: 
Santhiya Auguskani, D., Shiny Mary, D. and Reena Evency, A.
Subject Area: 
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Abstract: 

A true experimental study to evaluate the effectiveness of lemon peel extract on knee pain among patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis in a village at Kanyakumari district. Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of lemon peel extract on knee pain among patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis. Materials and Methods: A true experimental pre-test post-test control group design was adopted for the study. Sample size was 60, calculated using Slovin’s formula and with the help of simple random sampling method 30 participants were allotted in study group and 30 participants in control group.Pre- intervention and post-intervention knee pain was assessed using Western Ontario And McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Scale. Lemon peel extract was applied for 20 minutes once a day for 15 days for the study group and control group had not received any intervention. Mean, standard deviation and paired and unpaired ‘t’ test was used to evaluate the effectiveness of lemon peel extract on knee pain. The comparison of post- intervention knee pain score between study group and control group was analysed by unpaired ‘t’ test. The comparison of pre-intervention and post-intervention pain score within the group was analysed using paired ‘t’ test. Chi-square test was used to find out the association between demographic variables and clinical variables of the participants with their pre-intervention knee pain score. Results: The study results showed that, in study group, the mean post-intervention score on knee pain (29.63) was lower than the mean pre-intervention score on knee pain (79.5), which showed that, there was a significant difference between the mean pre-intervention and post-intervention score on knee pain, in study group, whereas the mean post- intervention score on knee pain in study group (29.63) with the standard deviation of (9.73)was lower than the mean post- intervention score on knee painin control group (75.9) with the standard deviation of (10.998). Unpaired ‘t’ test value for knee pain was 18.259 which was significant at p≤0.05 and was highly significant at p≤0.01, p≤0.001. In study group the paired ‘t’ test value for knee pain was 11.411 which was significant at p≤0.05 and was highly significant at p≤0.01, p≤0.001, and in control group the paired ‘t’ test value for knee pain was 3.636 which was significant at p≤0.05 and was highly significant at p≤0.01, p≤0.001. This represents the effectiveness of lemon peel extract on knee pain. Conclusion: According to the results, application of lemon peel extract had considerably reduced the knee pain, which revealed that the lemon peel extract was one of the most important and effective intervention in reducing knee pain.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran