CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Effect of training by using objective structured clinical examination "osce" on the outcome of clinical training of nursing students enrolled in psychiatric and mental health nursing course

Author: 
Dr. Nahed Mohamed Ahmed Morsy, Dr. Lila Helmy Othman, Dr. Mervat Hosny Shalaby and Samar Mabrook Abd Elsalam
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) has emerged during the past 2 decades as medicine (Oh et al., 2011). This examination type involves direct observation of clinical performance using standardized patients and structured checklists for marking. A variety of areas of medical performance can thus be evaluated, including interviewing skills, physical examination skills, and interpersonal skills (Brosnan et al., 2006 and Selim et al., 2011). Aim of the study: This study aimed to determine the effect of training by using Objective Structured Clinical Examination "OSCE" on the outcome of clinical training of nursing students enrolled in psychiatric and mental health nursing course and assess students' perception toward using OSCE as a training and evaluative tool in psychiatric and mental health clinical training. Material and Method: Subjects: The study subjects were include all students enrolled in psychiatric and mental health nursing course (150) at the first semester of academic year 2012-2013, in faculty of Nursing Tanta University. The students were divided into two main groups the study group (75) students were chosen randomly and control group (75) students. Tools of the study: A-Data collection tools: Tool (I): Students' perception toward OSCE as a training tool. Part (1) A socio-demographic data sheet, Part (2): Students' perception toward OSCE as a training tool. Tool (II): Students' perception toward OSCE as an evaluation tool. B- An intervention tool: Objective Structured Clinical Training and Examination program (OSCTE): Clinical training and evaluation by OSCE method were implemented on the study group enrolling in learning class activities only (exhibiting videos and examining through oral exam). Each study group were attend 9 sessions scheduled as three sessions per week, which were take about four hours per day, for about three weeks. Results: The main results revealed that there was positive and direct significant correlation between using OSCE sessions in training and OSCE examination and there is statistical significant difference in the total mean scores of the clinical exam rotation between study and control group as it tabulated respectively in the p-value (0.0158, 0.009, 0.024). Conclusion: The current study findings showed that the majority of the studied students' were having good overview toward OSCE as a training tool, and the most of the studied students' were having good overview toward OSCE as an examination tool. In regard to comparison between study and control group in their scores of exam rotation. There is significant difference in the students' scores of the exam rotation between both study and control group.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran