CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Correlation between the ratio of portal vein and splenic vein diameter versus grading of esophageal varices and grading of portal hypertensive gastropathy in 50 patients of chronic liver disease

Author: 
Dr. Meena, O.P., Dr. Ajay Singh, Dr. Gautam Kumar Bunker, Dr. Umesh Meena and Dr. Shekhar Gurjar
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background: Patients with chronic liver disease need to undergo screening with an upper Gl endoscopy to detect esophageal varices and to institute prophylactic measures in patients with large esophageal varices at the time of diagnosis and during follow up. This poses social and medical burden due to the greater number of cirrhotic patients and lesser number of endoscopic units. In this study we aim to identify the non invasive predictors of esophageal varices particularly portal vein, splenic vein diameter and portal vein/splenic vein diameter ratio. Objective: Assessment of the correlation between the ratio of portal vein and splenic vein diameter with the grading of esophageal varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy in a group of 50 patients diagnosed with chronic liver disease. Materials and methods: Observational study of 50 patients of chronic liver disease were included between June 2022 and November 2022. Relevant clinical parameters were assessed which included physical examination, complete hemogram, biochemical workup. upper GI endoscopy for Grading of varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy and ultrasonographic measurement of portal vein diameter and splenic vein diameter. Portal vein/Splenic vein diameter ratio was calculated for all patients. Results: Among the 50 patients studied males predominated the study with 80%. Out of the study population 96% of the patients had varices. Higher grades of esophageal varices exists with higher PVD and greater PVD/SVD ratio. In our study we observed that those with Grade 1 esophageal varices had mean PVD/SVD ratio of 1.37 ± 0.08, those with Grade 2 varices had 1.45 ± 0.08 and cases with grade 3 varices had mean ratio of 1.55 ± 0.08, p value was <0.05, which is statistically significant. Moreover we observed that those with mild PHG had mean PVD/SVD ratio of 1.45 ± 0.11, those with moderate PHG had 1.47 ± 0.05 and cases with severe PHG had mean ratio of 1.59 ± 0.07, p value was <0.05, which is statistically significant. Conclusion: From our study we conclude that as PVD/SVD ratio increases there is higher chances of esophageal varices and portal hypertensive gastropathy as well hence prediction of esophageal varices by ratio of portal vein Splenic vein diameter via ultrasound reduce the burden on the endoscopy units, avoiding unnecessary screening endoscopies. Apart from being noninvasive, portal vein diameter and Splenic vein diameter ratio count is a relatively inexpensive and easily reproducible.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

CHUDE NKIRU PATRICIA
Nigeria
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran