CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Comparison of the viewpoint groups among professionals of perioperative setting in prioritization of antecedents of the interdisciplinary collaboration using modified q-methodology

Author: 
Julia Sherriff, Dr. Elgenaid Hamadain, Dr. Ralph Didlake, Dr. Hamed Benghuzzi, Dr. William Mustain, Dr. Michelle Tucci and Dr. Donna Sullivan
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Background: Continued concerns for improvements in safety and quality of the perioperative setting (PS) process and outcomes drive the efforts in improving the interdisciplinary collaboration (IC) to match or supplant the change brought by innovation with better reflexivity through planning. PS professionals routinely engaged in surgery and recovery hold the prime insights into the active process of ICPS and are best capacitated to articulate their perspectives and priorities. Purpose: The purpose of this research was to describe the patterns of ICPS factor prioritization within the interdisciplinary team (IDT). The questions guiding this research were: 1. What antecedents of IC are considered by IDT professionals to be important in PS? 2. What viewpoints and potential contentions exist in prioritizations of IC improvements? We have utilized a modified Q-methodological approach to assess the subjective viewpoints within IDT professionals. Materials and Methods: This research is based on mixed-methods survey design with modified Q-methodology adapted for utilization in a statistical platform, such as SPSS. Qualitative theme extraction from literature review (LR) was utilized in selection ICPS factors for inclusion into the concourse of statements, which from the Q-sample was induced. ICPS factor Q-sort was obtained from participant responses in 12x12 prioritization matrix built into a survey in REDCap. The viewpoint groups were then identified with factor analysis of the rotated (rows-columns) matrix and subjected to further analysis of concordances and discordances. Results: Five primary factors of ICPS as identified by IDT members include: Critical Communication and Feedback (CCF), Purpose, Team Technical Competence (TTC), Trust, and Adaptability. Cumulative 94.672 % of variance was explained with eight viewpoint groups with eigan values greater than 1.0. and factor loadings greater than 0.30 in the Q-FA model. Eight viewpoint groups included: Technocratic, Polarized-reflexive-visionary, Collegial, Communicator, Focused on Critical Process, Power-Observant (conscious of power dynamics), and Task-Oriented. The ninth viewpoint group included Absolutist viewpoints (16.67% of P-set). Conclusions: In this study, we were able to identify the primary factors important in improving ICPS and the viewpoint groups and patterns using modified Q-methodologic approach. Identification of potential sources of contention and dispute are necessary for IDT reflexivity and adaptability in innovative environment of PS.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

CHUDE NKIRU PATRICIA
Nigeria
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran