CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Comparison of optical performance of concentrators suitable for thermal applications

Author: 
Imhamed M. Saleh, Mohamed Bughazem and Khalifa Khalifa
Subject Area: 
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Abstract: 

The paper focuses on six different concentrator configurations to provide better insight into the geometrical-optical performance of six different configurations are Elliptical Parabolic Concentrator (EPC), Circular Parabolic Concentrator (CCPC) and Square Parabolic Concentrator (SPC), Elliptical Hyperboloid Concentrator (EHC); Circular Hyperboloid Concentrator (CHC) and Square Hyperboloid Concentrator (SHC). In this study the most commonly used optical elements are compared with some newer designs of concentrators for their optical performance. Detailed analysis is performed using ray tracing technique to identify the important parameters affecting the overall performance of these concentrators. Finally, results are summarised showing the best practices to be employed for different thermal applications. The simulation analysis indicates that the parabolic geometry profiles (EPC, CCPC, SPC) achieve high optical efficiency values. The CCPC demonstrates the highest optical efficiency at 92% but has a narrow acceptance angle of ±15 degrees. The SPC achieves an optical efficiency of 85% with the same acceptance angle. In contrast, the EPC has a lower optical efficiency of 33% but offers a wider acceptance angle of ±30 degrees, twice that of the EPC. For the hyperboloid geometry profiles (EHC, CHC, SHC), the EHC achieves a maximum theoretical optical efficiency of 28% with an acceptance angle of ±30 degrees. The CHC exhibits a lower optical efficiency of 21% but with a narrower acceptance angle of ±15 degrees. The SHC attains an optical efficiency of 39% with an acceptance angle of ±30 degrees.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran