CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Analysis of the impact of interior gateway protocols on the network performance

Author: 
Saleh Hussein Al-awami, Ali Tahir Abu Raas and Emad Awadh Ben Srity
Subject Area: 
Physical Sciences and Engineering
Abstract: 

In an Autonomous System (AS), network devices communicate through interior gateway protocols. Because they have characteristics such as high throughput, flexibility, low overhead, scalability, easy configuration, and high bandwidth and CPU utilization, interior gateway protocols are among the routing protocols with the fastest growing usage in networking technologies. Despite the fact that convergence time is a critical issue in any of these routing protocols, The network's updated, comprehensive, and correct information is summarized during convergence time. Numerous studies have examined interior gateway protocols; however, only a small number of these studies have taken link failure into account while employing various network scenarios. This study makes a contribution in this field. (Graphical Network Simulator) GNS3 software simulates a ten-router setup to mimic a complex real-time enterprise-level network. Every protocol is put into practice using the intended topology. Methods/Statistical Analysis: The interior gateway protocols Routing Information Protocol (RIP), Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), Enhanced Interior Gateway Routing Protocol (EIGRP), and Intermediate System to Intermediate System (IS-IS) are analyzed in a complex enterprise-level network using GNS3 version 2.2.34 software. Results: End-to-end delay, jitter, and convergence time for each protocol implemented in the planned topology are examined. Each node has authentication capabilities to guarantee secure data delivery. Finding the best practical interior gateway routing protocol for various traffic scenarios is the study's main goal. In this paper, results are shown. The EIGRP protocol is superior in terms of end-to-end delay and convergence time after the results are tallied. While OSPF is supposed to have lower jitter than other Interior Gateway Protocols, in terms of convergence time, IS-IS outperforms OSPF. The results indicate that RIP protocols had the worst delays and convergence times.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran