CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

A cephalometric study on effectiveness of orthodontic treatment of bimaxillary protrusion with premolar extraction - a retrospective study

Author: 
Sufia Qaiser, Sunil Kumar, M., Silju Mathew, Mahantesh, C. and Sonal, S.
Subject Area: 
Health Sciences
Abstract: 

Objectives: This study was designed to evaluate for an appropriate treatment plan (extraction or non-extraction) for reducing the dental and soft tissue procumbency of bimaxillary protrusion individuals and also to compare the pre and post-treatment values of the two groups to provide an evidence based approach of premolar extraction in treating bimaxillary protrusion individuals. Method: The sample consisted of 30 bimaxillary protrusion patients treated with four premolar extraction and 30 treated with non-extraction line of treatment between the ages of 15-30 years taken from the archives of Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics, M.S.Ramaiah Dental College & Hospital, Bangalore. Pre and post-treatment lateral cephalograms were evaluated using a series of 27 linear and angular measurements, and the effect of orthodontic correction was determined using different statistical tests. Results: Pre-treatment (T1) characteristics of bimaxillary protrusion individuals demonstrated increased procumbency due to decreased interincisal angle, increased (upper incisor to SN angle, lower incisor to mandibular plane, upper incisor to NA linear and angle, lower incisor to NB linear and angle, upper incisor to APog and lower incisor to APog) in extraction as well as non-extraction groups but the variation was more in extraction group than non-extraction group. Soft tissue parameters like upper lip to E-line, lower lip to E-line and nasolabial angle showed significant statistics post-treatment with extraction and insignificant statistics with non-extraction. Pretreatment mean values of all four measurements of alveolar width were less in bimaxillary protrusive sample while upper and lower alveolar heights were found to be greater in both groups. Conclusion: The comparison of skeletal, dental and soft tissue post-treatment (T2) values between extraction and non- extraction group demonstrated that premolar extraction is more effective in reducing the dental and soft tissue procumbency in bimaxillary protrusion patients as compared to non-extraction mode of treatment. Hence it was concluded that only borderline bimaxillary protrusion cases can be treated with non-extraction line of treatment.

PDF file: 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran