CERTIFICATE

IMPACT FACTOR 2021

Subject Area

  • Life Sciences / Biology
  • Architecture / Building Management
  • Asian Studies
  • Business & Management
  • Chemistry
  • Computer Science
  • Economics & Finance
  • Engineering / Acoustics
  • Environmental Science
  • Agricultural Sciences
  • Pharmaceutical Sciences
  • General Sciences
  • Materials Science
  • Mathematics
  • Medicine
  • Nanotechnology & Nanoscience
  • Nonlinear Science
  • Chaos & Dynamical Systems
  • Physics
  • Social Sciences & Humanities

Why Us? >>

  • Open Access
  • Peer Reviewed
  • Rapid Publication
  • Life time hosting
  • Free promotion service
  • Free indexing service
  • More citations
  • Search engine friendly

Effect of time based selective domain of self rehabilitation on health related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease

Author: 
Nemani Rama Thulasi, Vadivelan, K. and 3Sivakumar
Subject Area: 
Life Sciences
Abstract: 

Aim of the study: The aim of the study is to compare the effect of time based selective domain of self-management rehabilitation on health related quality of life in Parkinson’s disease Need for the study: There is no cure for Parkinson’s disease. Medical management is directed at slowing of disease progression and symptomatic treatment. Individuals who develop Parkinson's disease are confronted not only with the physical and psychological issues that impact quality of life. The medical community is increasingly recognizing health related quality of life as a major criterion in evaluation of health interventions, particularly as it relates to Parkinson’s disease, in the content of both motor and non motor symptoms. Research has pointed out that maintaining positive attitude optimism and happiness can lead to longer lives, less disability and increased quality of life. Rehabilitation has an important role in reducing functional limitations while promoting activity participation and independence. In addition complication of Parkinson’s disease can be reduced or prevented while quality of life is promoted. The ideal rehabilitation program considers the patients disease history, course and symptoms, together with impairments, functional limitations and disability. Of equal importance are the patient’s abilities, priorities and resources including family, home and community resources. Study Design: Experimental Study Type: Comparative Sample Size: 18subjects were taken for the study and divided into three groups Namely Group A, Group B, Group C, Group A: control Group (5), Group B: experimental Group 1 (6), Group C: experimental Group 2 (7) Sampling Method: Convenient sampling Study Duration: 6weeks Results: According to table 1 & table 2, difference between three groups in terms of Parkinson disease questionnaire – 39. Group 1 was given medications, group 2 was given medications and 18 hours rehabilitation and group 3 was given medications and 27 hours rehabilitation. The mean difference between group 1 & 2 is -2.5987745 and mean difference between group 1 & 3 is 12.8867157. The p value is < .066. The mean difference between group 1 & 3 is greatest than group 1 & 2. The mean difference between group 2 & 1 is 2.5987745 and mean difference between group 2 & 3 is 15. 4854902. The p value is < .019. The mean difference between group 2 &3 is greatest than group 2&1. The mean difference between group 3&1 is -12.8867157 and mean difference between group 3&2 is -15.484902. The p value is < .019, the mean difference group 3&2 is greatest than group 3&1. Hence the mean difference between the group 3&2 is greater than group 1&2 and group 1&3.

PDF file: 

CALL FOR PAPERS

 

ONLINE PAYPAL PAYMENT

IJMCE RECOMMENDATION

Advantages of IJCR

  • Rapid Publishing
  • Professional publishing practices
  • Indexing in leading database
  • High level of citation
  • High Qualitiy reader base
  • High level author suport

Plagiarism Detection

IJCR is following an instant policy on rejection those received papers with plagiarism rate of more than 20%. So, All of authors and contributors must check their papers before submission to making assurance of following our anti-plagiarism policies.

 

EDITORIAL BOARD

CHUDE NKIRU PATRICIA
Nigeria
Dr. Swamy KRM
India
Dr. Abdul Hannan A.M.S
Saudi Arabia.
Luai Farhan Zghair
Iraq
Hasan Ali Abed Al-Zu’bi
Jordanian
Fredrick OJIJA
Tanzanian
Firuza M. Tursunkhodjaeva
Uzbekistan
Faraz Ahmed Farooqi
Saudi Arabia
Eric Randy Reyes Politud
Philippines
Elsadig Gasoom FadelAlla Elbashir
Sudan
Eapen, Asha Sarah
United State
Dr.Arun Kumar A
India
Dr. Zafar Iqbal
Pakistan
Dr. SHAHERA S.PATEL
India
Dr. Ruchika Khanna
India
Dr. Recep TAS
Turkey
Dr. Rasha Ali Eldeeb
Egypt
Dr. Pralhad Kanhaiyalal Rahangdale
India
DR. PATRICK D. CERNA
Philippines
Dr. Nicolas Padilla- Raygoza
Mexico
Dr. Mustafa Y. G. Younis
Libiya
Dr. Muhammad shoaib Ahmedani
Saudi Arabia
DR. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL MOHMAND
United State
DR. MAHESH SHIVAJI CHAVAN
India
DR. M. ARUNA
India
Dr. Lim Gee Nee
Malaysia
Dr. Jatinder Pal Singh Chawla
India
DR. IRAM BOKHARI
Pakistan
Dr. FARHAT NAZ RAHMAN
Pakistan
Dr. Devendra kumar Gupta
India
Dr. ASHWANI KUMAR DUBEY
India
Dr. Ali Seidi
Iran
Dr. Achmad Choerudin
Indonesia
Dr Ashok Kumar Verma
India
Thi Mong Diep NGUYEN
France
Dr. Muhammad Akram
Pakistan
Dr. Imran Azad
Oman
Dr. Meenakshi Malik
India
Aseel Hadi Hamzah
Iraq
Anam Bhatti
Malaysia
Md. Amir Hossain
Bangladesh
Ahmet İPEKÇİ
Turkey
Mirzadi Gohari
Iran